Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Imbi Paju

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Snow closure. Deletion concerns appear to have been addressed. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 04:00, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Imbi Paju[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Insufficient sources. TFD (talk) 04:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Insufficient sources in the article, or in existence? Looks like there's plenty of news articles about her.--Michig (talk) 08:00, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], and [6]. SL93 (talk) 15:30, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:53, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:54, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Strong coverage on GNews archives. Cavarrone (talk) 19:39, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Significant coverage exists in multiple reliable sources, as evidenced above by User:SL93. Gongshow ^Talk 03:24, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per SL93.Estlandia (dialogue) 08:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Subject only needs sources to exist; not for them to be reflected in the article (it would be nice of course, but is not what we look at at AfD). Sufficient RS coverage.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.